In this recorded broadcast Dr. Jenifer Daniels does the math and proves that condoms do not stop the spread of AIDS. Secondly, Dr. Daniels proves mathematically that HIV / AIDS is not a ***ually transmitted disease. Having *** does not increase the chance of contracting HIV / AIDS.
Next you'll be telling us we can't die if we scurry out under a bus.
How come the world is wrong and you are right all the time? I have to speak out because this time people could die if they accept what you are saying. Have you no conscience? This new epistle of yours reminds me of Oliver Tambo years ago when he claimed that HIV was not the cause of AIDS.
Take the standard advice, folks, and keep yourselves safe.
First of all it is not me only who is saying this. I got this information from Dr. Jenifer Daniels, MD. She made her conclusions based on using published government statistics. If you would read the article or listen to her podcast you might understand what she is saying.
1. The numbers of people claimed to have HIV / AIDS and the numbers from those who died from HIV / AIDS do not match up. In other words far less people have died from HIV then are projected.
2. The tests have been totally proven to be inaccurate with many false positives.
3. It seems that there are more people who have died from the diagnosis rather than simply having the "disease". In plain English, if a person has HIV / AIDS a certain percentage should die. But there are many who have the disease but do not know it. Logically speaking that percentage of death should be the same whether they are diagnosed or not. The fact is more people die who are told they have HIV / AIDS than those who are undiagnosed. You have to ask yourself the question, why?
There are plenty of other issues that I could say. But if you want to know more listen to what she is saying on her podcast.
Now, to address the issues you raise. I give no advice. You do as you like. I only write the information. I think some people watch way too much TV and really do not take time to understand what is being said and what are the facts.
I know it is a common belief that condoms prevent infections of HIV / AIDS. But condoms fail a certain pecentage of the time. I believe they fail 15% of the time according to Dr. Daniels. If you do the math you would expect a certain percent of the time that people would become infected from those failures. The fact is that there are not nearly that number of infections as the condom failure rate would indicate. The numbers would indicate, therefore, that condoms have no effect.
Further to the point, if a couple used no condom, they would have to have I believe the number is 300 intimate contacts before there would be any transmission of infection. Again the numbers do not support the belief. You would have to listen to the podcast to see exactly what Dr. Daniels is saying.
As I have said in the past, people should be allowed to question and not just believe things without questioning them. For those who want to use condoms they should. My only point is that the things we assume to be correct are often not that way. If we are going to be safe we must think and we must question.
Reference your point 1. I assume the disparity will be caused by the improvements in medication offered to HIV positive patients in the last decade or two, such a different situation to thirty years ago when the illness first appeared on the scene.
Your point 3 is interesting and I have no theory to offer that could explain it.
You say you give no advice, but some who read your words are not as clever or academic as you, so I say it is better not to confuse them with subtle academic arguments.
Even when a condom fails, it is still better than wearing no condom at all for HIV seems to work on a 'degree' basis - the greater the transfer of infected material, the higher the risk of the other person being infected with HIV.
Re Dr. Daniels' assertions. It would be naive for we lay people to go overboard and believe one academic who has yet to convince her fellow-academics about the rightness of her data and theories. If she is one day proved right - fine. Until then let people follow the standard advice. Got to go now ... TV programmes waiting to be watched.
Let me get this straight. You think by telling people that their protection does not work is the same as telling them that there is no such things as HIV / AIDS? It seems to me that if you wanted to protect yourself that you would want to know if your current protection was not working. Simple logic.
I think you miss the point. The fact is according to government statistics more people die from knowing they have HIV / AIDS than from not knowing. This implies that the treatment is worse than the disease.
The truth of the matter is that if you are treated with the "miracle" drugs you are more likely to die.If you are not treated you are more likely to live as in the case of Magic Johnson and many thousands of others who were diagnosed with HIV / AIDS. Mr. Johnson was diagnosed 20 years ago, refused medicatiion and is still as vibrant as ever. There are many who have been diagnosed previously and later can find no trace of the HIV virus.
Whether a peson is easily confused or not I believe we all have a right to be honestly informed and we have a right to make our own decisions.
Dr. Daniels, a Harvard educated physician with a medical degree and a masters degree is only one of hundreds of doctors who have noticed the inconsistencies of the HIV / AIDS pandemic. Of course their questions and doubts are never publicized because HIV / AIDS research is a big ticket item and many universities and researchers are counting on that money for their livelihood.
Long before I ever heard of Dr. Daniels I had read many books about the dubius origins of AIDS. Dr. Daniels is just one of many people who has blown the whistle.
Dr. Daniels tells a very funny story about a friend of a friend from India who had discovered a cure for AIDS. The friend agreed to reveal the secret cure to Dr. Daniels if she promised not to disclose it to anyone. She agreed. The friend sent a sample of the secret cure to her. She cloistered herself in her office and opened the package. It turned out to be Tumeric.
I also like the work of Gary Null who is not even a medical doctor but owns a vegeterian restaurant in New York City. Under his guidance thousands of people have recoverd from HIV / AIDS. Mr. Null has been labeled a quack and a kook and an AIDS denier. In fact, his very popular radio show was taken off the air because of his views.
HIV / AIDS has turned into an emotionally charged debate. Anyone who dares to question the mainstream information is labled and attacked. Unfortunately, some believe that people should not think for themselves but just follow popular beliefs. I certainly do not want to be labeled or attacked. But I do feel it is necessary to give people an alternate view which they can accept or ignore if they want to.
There are dozens and dozens of articles raising questions about HIV / AIDS. This is hardly as clear as the nose on your face issue. I think that debate deserves to be discussed openly and objectively without threats and accusations. Thanks for taking the time to read all of this.
Next you'll be telling us we can't die if we scurry out under a bus.
How come the world is wrong and you are right all the time? I have to speak out because this time people could die if they accept what you are saying. Have you no conscience? This new epistle of yours reminds me of Oliver Tambo years ago when he claimed that HIV was not the cause of AIDS.
Take the standard advice, folks, and keep yourselves safe.