Are we in Britain mad? Why did we years ago calmly accept the extremist solution that somebody in power bad-temperedly imposed on us all to solve the problem of motorists speeding in built-up places? The question has often passed through my mind as I pass over the humps and suffer spasms of pain in my back as I do so, and I also wonder "Is this mad state of affairs going to be allowed to remain for evermore!!??" I understand that each hump costs £2,000 to install, so there is an economic side to the argument too. Humps cause damage to your tyres too, which strikes me as unjust.
I see that in early-2008 the council in Wirral, Merseyside bravely tried out an alternative, called the Bring Accidents Down 2 Zero. Volunteers were given speed guns and were asked to pass information on to the Merseyside police. I don't know how well or poorly this experiment turned out, but surely something along those lines would be better than what we are stuck with at present; and seemingly for evermore unless we all protest and press for a change in the policy. I would even be in favour of a black box 'spy in the cab' in each vehicle rather than the nonsense that we have to put up with at present.
In the 1950s and '60s the annual death toll on Britain's roads was of the order of 6,000. This had been halved by the time the draconian traffic calming measures were imposed on us about twenty years ago, so it begs the question: why was it felt necessary to introduce such extreme new measures rather than do something to catch speedsters and other wrongdoers?
What they have done is reminiscent of a harsh class teacher punishing the whole class rather than find out which child had transgressed. It is the methodology of the lazy man and is unjust on the majority.